Dr. Naomi Wolf makes serious allegations against Pfizer: Internal documents allegedly show vaccine-related deaths were intentionally covered up. One of the most high-profile cases involves a 63-year-old Kansas woman whose death Pfizer failed to report to the FDA in time to secure emergency use authorization for its COVID-19 vaccine. In her report, Dr. Wolf highlights how protocol violations and questionable handling of medical data led to serious misinformation. Her comments raise questions not only about the company’s transparency and accountability, but also about the vaccine’s safety and approval process.
Dr. Naomi Wolf: Pfizer Hid The Deaths Of 8 People
” Pfizer, from their internal documents, delayed reporting the deaths of 8 subjects, people who died with COVID who were vaccinated.”“And they delayed reporting it in spite of their own protocols that said they had to report… pic.twitter.com/p6XgJmaGTt
— Camus (@newstart_2024) December 18, 2024
Dr. Naomi Wolf: Pfizer Hid The Deaths Of 8 People ” Pfizer, from their internal documents, delayed reporting the deaths of 8 subjects, people who died with COVID who were vaccinated.”
“And they delayed reporting it in spite of their own protocols that said they had to report deaths immediately, so that they could misinform the FDA in order to get the emergency use authorization that allowed the rollout of the vaccine that we all know about.”
“So what this letter does, written by Dr. Giante Kunadasan, one of our very distinguished volunteers and anesthetist and perioperative physician, she drilled down very deeply, like forensic journalism, you know, matched with medical knowledge into one of the reports of one of these deaths. And it’s very disturbing.”
“So she’s alleging that the FDA—I’m sorry, that Pfizer failed to disclose to the FDA the death of a Kansas participant. The death reportedly occurred 41 days after this woman received her second vaccine dose, and that the failure to report this was at a critical juncture at which the EUA, the emergency use authorization, would either be given or not given.”
“What’s very, very disturbing is the way Giante Kunadasan drills into this poor woman’s horrible mistreatment leading to her, I would say murder, I’m not a lawyer, but it sure looks like murder to me, her death by Pfizer. She’s a 63-year-old Kansas woman. And she was a participant in this trial at a research site in Newton, Kansas.”
“Now this woman was not healthy to start out with. She was very frail to start out with. And anyone could tell if they were looking with the eyes of medicine instead of treating her like a lab rat. Her preexisting conditions included hypertension, that’s high blood pressure, and depression.”
“But Pfizer decided that she met the trial’s inclusion criteria, and she got the first and the second dose and she passed away on October 19th, 2020. So she was mildly overweight. She had a body mass index of 27. She was post-menopausal, depression, hypertension, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, sleep apnea, multiple medications she was on before getting the injections.”
Her medications including Trazodone, Sertraline for depression, Pregabalin and Baclofen for degenerative disc disease, as well as Amlodipine and Hydralazine for hypertension. So a bucket of serious severe medications that she was on for her multiple health conditions.”
“She completed the screening process. They said, sure, come on in, be our guinea pig. And received her first dose on the 18th of August, 2020, and the second on the 8th of September. And then she came for one month follow-up. after dose two on the 7th of October, and then she died 41 days after receiving the second dose on the 19th of October. And that was 12 days after her planned follow-up visit.”
“So the emergency contact told the clinical site of Pfizer, right, about the death, the death of this woman. In other words, the emergency contact was so disturbed by the… apparent cause effect of the woman gets her second dose then passes away, that the emergency contact reported it to Pfizer, and then our researchers alleged to AG Kobach that there was a 37-day delay in Pfizer officially documenting her death.”
“And this, again, violated Pfizer’s own protocols. And her death and autopsy findings, not only that, were not disclosed. during the Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting on December 10th, 2020, the important meeting, critical meeting at which the FDA evaluated Pfizer’s data for emergency use authorization approval.”
“In other words, the woman’s dead, she’s been autopsied. There was so much alarm about her death that her emergency contact told Pfizer, Pfizer withheld the information from the FDA. at the meeting at which Pfizer’s looking at the documents to assess things like, do we give an emergency use authorization?”
“Will this kill people, right? So what it does to withhold her death as well as the other seven deaths is as I’ve shared with you all before, it allowed Pfizer falsely to claim to the FDA and to the world that you’re better off with a vaccine than without.”
“If they had correctly totaled those deaths and included them appropriately, they’d have had to tell the FDA and the world that you’re more likely to die and be hospitalized with the injection than without. But essentially, they hid this woman’s death in a horrible way, along with seven other people.”
“And here, I wish that you could see there’s a chart, like these Mengele-type charts. Sorry, there we go. probably can’t see very clearly there is, did Pfizer have knowledge of the death? Yes, yes, yes. All the way down. Yes, yes, yes. Pfizer had knowledge of those deaths and didn’t report them. And so this has now gone to the Kansas attorney general.”
“It’s a Kansas woman who was killed by Pfizer in Kansas and Pfizer essentially hid her body. from the government. I mean, usually a vaccine goes through 10 to 15 years of testing to make sure that it’s safe and effective. The emergency use authorization is basically a, kind of all bets are off, Hail Mary pass, fine, fine.”
“We’ve looked at the data you’ve got to date and there’s enough to reassure us that it’s worth the risk of untold side effects we don’t know about because it’s an emergency. That’s the reason for this exemption to the normal process.”
“But what you have to understand is they withheld the killing of this woman from the FDA at the point at which the FDA is trying to figure out, is it safe for everyone else? So I can’t, you know, she knew that she was volunteering for an experimental.”
It’s Giante Kunadasan who wrote the letter to the attorney general. I think she was right to do so. You know, a woman died of horrible medical mal… maltreatment and her death wasn’t properly disclosed, wasn’t lawfully disclosed in the state of Kansas. To me, it looks like the vaccine killed her.”
“But what’s more important is her emergency contact, which usually means in these records, her doctor was so concerned about the fact that she died shortly after getting the second shot. I mean, she was frail, but there’s nothing that indicates that she would have died of high blood pressure, she would have died of depression, or the other conditions she had at that moment.”
“So I guess what the reason I’m kind of answering this way is we can’t see her autopsy report. They didn’t submit the autopsy report. They didn’t enclose it in time, right, for the FDA to review it. So it certainly looked to her doctor like the vaccine killed her.”
“But the point is, that’s supposed to be assessed by the FDA before rolling it out for everyone else. And remember, they decided that it didn’t work to stop COVID. So no, she wouldn’t have been better off in any universe taking this injection.”
