This highly dangerous document was previously expected to be adopted at this year’s assembly in Geneva. However, it was expected to be approved at the end of the WHO member states’ meeting rather than at the very beginning.
The current consensus is that the pandemic pact, as the pamphlet is now called, should “prevent panic and chaos in the future.” By this, of course, they mean future pandemics.
In reality, this dangerous document lays the groundwork for more and more pandemic scares and declarations (or potential pandemics), including a license to print money for the pharmaceutical industry. Despite all the warnings, it has now been approved…
After three years of negotiations, the controversial pandemic treaty was formally adopted today at the World Health Assembly in Geneva. Opponents of the pandemic pact are calling on governments to exercise their right to opt out.
What is being sold as a great way to avoid panic and chaos actually promotes exactly that – with clear benefits for the WHO and Big Pharma.
The treaty is now publicly available. The undemocratically legitimized WHO and its staunch defenders in the member states do not see the devastating impact of the Covid policy as a warning: Rather, interventions due to alleged “emergencies” should be even more effective in the future than before.
The politicians who will be at the forefront of the next pandemic policy will of course have the perfect excuse for introducing restrictions and mandatory vaccinations: “That’s what the WHO wants and we have to do what they say.”
What is particularly worrying is that a system is being created that can produce such emergencies on a continuous basis.
The contracting parties, i.e. the member states, are to massively expand their biomonitoring. In the future, they will therefore specifically target pathogens that could potentially trigger a new “pandemic.” Possible zoonotic transmissions are also in the spotlight.
Of course, if all pathogens are sequenced and monitored indiscriminately, there is a high risk that irrelevant findings will cause panic, which could then lead to the WHO Director-General and his committee gratefully declaring a public health emergency of international concern.
This is supposedly to prevent panic and chaos. In fact, this seems to be exactly what is desired.
The treaty provides for public funding for the development of “pandemic products,” which are then, of course, to be mass-produced and distributed around the world in a “fair” manner.
In modern Orwellian terminology, “fair” always means that the bill for the so-called developing countries is paid by others, the so-called “developed” countries: The supposed “needs” of the population – for example, the entire African continent – can be used to generate profits that Big Pharma is not willing to miss out on under any circumstances.
The Covid years have shown what an unimaginable amount of money can end up in the coffers of speculators. These speculators in the pharmaceutical industry are in turn the ones who largely finance the WHO.
In order for the products promoted in this way to reach the people quickly, a regulatory framework for rapid approval in emergency situations is to be contractually created.
This means that the alleged state of emergency suddenly becomes the norm. Medical standards are effectively buried here.
The harm caused by the mass application of gene injections is obvious, and the boldly proclaimed effectiveness of the drugs has long been exposed as a lie. But it should be possible to repeat the “emergency approval” at will, even more easily than in the Covid years.
While the USA, which left the WHO for good reason, is cooperating with Health Secretary RFK Jr. to ensure that pharmaceutical companies finally have to prove the safety and efficacy of their products in meaningful studies, this principle is effectively abolished in WHO member states, provided that a state of emergency is declared.
It is a license to produce pharmaceuticals in an emergency regime, without any supervision and under the pretext of the threat of a pandemic. The so-called pandemic has shown that part of the population can be misled and broken again.
In the section “Communication and public awareness”, the WHO calls for an investigation into the factors that hinder or strengthen “compliance with public health and social measures in the event of a pandemic, as well as trust in science and public health institutions, authorities and bodies.”
In concrete terms, this means that we will all be increasingly exposed to pressure in the field of health policy and, of course, the “single truth” (for example, the one about two doses and a full stop).
The WHO also pointed out that the mandate for effective “risk communication” must be interpreted in the context of the new International Health Regulations.
The supposed fight against alleged disinformation has since been met with sharp criticism from lawyers and advocates for freedom of expression and information.
The WHO’s measures against the so-called “infodemic” range from quasi-propaganda offensives to “debunking” through disclaimers and “fact checks” to suppressing and censoring unwanted information.
The problem is that for the WHO and its supporters, anything that contradicts their own agenda is disinformation.
Member states that have approved this new system of professional external control of financial flows are thus giving Tedros the authority to impose lockdowns on their own populations, if the governments agree to it.
When propagandists of Covid restrictions and so-called “vaccination” praise the pandemic treaty today, it is clear what to think of this document.
Although they are not – unlike the original draft – binding WHO regulations, it can be expected that most countries will comply, with the pandemic agreement being an excuse that will also lead to changes in laws.
And most states will probably comply. Just look at the governments that are being formed across Europe. Everywhere in the coming years, governments that led Covid policies will remain – or return.
Given the increasing indications that another “plandemic” is coming, we will probably soon have “something to look forward to.”
Source:
https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA78/A78_10-en.pdf
https://report24.news/who-pandemievertrag-verabschiedet-ein-system-zur-generierung-neuer-notstaende-und-profite/
https://opiniojuris.org/2024/09/20/the-2024-amendments-to-the-international-health-regulations-a-commentary-part-ii-selected-substantive-amendments/
https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1
